-
Links
-
Doogie2K's Tweets
@Baroque97 Right now, all we got is some token ice in some permashaded areas and some giant dirt/gravel piles in parking lots. -> 19 minutes ago
@Baroque97 Yeah, I hope there's at least some snow out in Canmore when I go cross-country skiing next week. -> 20 minutes ago
-
Gerard's Tweets
@parboora ParBQ. #HorriblePun #WorstJokeEver #SoBadItsNotGoodItsWorse -> 22 hours ago
Close to punching a teenager in the face at a Canucks game. Literally screaming in my ear 'cuz I was wearing an Oil jersey. The whole game. -> 2 days ago
-
Matt's Tweets
Here's a wild idea. Put your debit not working sign at the start of your drive-thru, not at the order board... #dumbass -> 4 days ago
So is a commercial for the SlimBand on the Food network ironic cruelty, or good marketing? -> 4 weeks ago
For those who are not as good as picturing these things, here’s Google Videos to the rescue…
Matt
The perspective of that video bugs me. It tries to be a side-by-side comparison, but the planets seem to fade back along the z-axis.
If I had to guess, I’d say that the planets/stars were all centered along the x-axis (running through the planets dead-center), and as they slide along the x-axis, the camera needs to start pulling out on the z-axis in order to accommodate the massive size differentials…
Or is that over-thinking it?
No, I think that’s what they did. It just looks odd and my brain gets angry with the 2D representation using the z-axis. It’s discombobulating.